Abstract
A real-time visual processing theory is used to unify the explanation of monocular and binocular brightness data. This theory describes adaptive processes which overcome limitations of the visual uptake process to synthesize informative visual representations of the external world. The brightness data include versions of the Craik-O’Brien-Cornsweet effect and its exceptions, Bergstrom’s demonstrations comparing the brightnesses of smoothly modulated and step-like luminance profiles, Hamada’s demonstrations of nonclassical differences between the perception of luminance decrements and increments, Fechner’s paradox, binocular brightness averaging, binocular brightness summation, binocular rivalry, and fading of stabilized images and ganzfelds. Familiar concepts such as spatial frequency analysis, Mach bands, and edge contrast are relevant but insufficient to explain the totality of these data. Two parallel contour-sensitive processes interact to generate the theory’s brightness, color, and form explanations. A boundary-contour process is sensitive to the orientation and amount of contrast but not to the direction of contrast in scenic edges. It generates contours that form the boundaries of monocular perceptual domains. The spatial patterning of these contours is sensitive to the global configuration of scenic elements. A feature-contour process is insensitive to the orientation of contrast, but is sensitive to both the amount of contrast and to the direction of contrast in scenic edges. It triggers a diffusive filling-in reaction of featural quality within perceptual domains whose boundaries are dynamically defined by boundary contours. The boundary-contour system is hypothesized to include the hypercolumns in visual striate cortex. The feature-contour system is hypothesized to include the blobs in visual striate cortex. These preprocessed monocular activity patterns enter consciousness in the theory via a process of resonant binocular matching that is capable of selectively lifting whole monocular patterns into a binocular representation of form-and-color-in-depth. This binocular process is hypothesized to occur in area V4 of the visual pre striate cortex.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arend, L. E., Buehler, J. N., &Lockhead, G. R. (1971). Difference information in brightness perception.Perception & Psychophysics,9, 367–370
Bergström, S. S. (1966). A paradox in the perception of luminance gradients, I.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,7, 209–224.
Bergström, S. S. (1967a). A paradox in the perception of luminance gradients, II.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,8, 25–32.
Bergström, S. S. (1967b). A paradox in the perception of luminance gradients, III.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,8, 33–37.
Blake, R., &Fox, R. (1974). Binocular rivalry suppression: Insensitive to spatial frequency and orientation change.Vision Research,14, 687–692.
Blake, R., Sloane, M., &Fox, R. (1981). Further developments in binocular summation.Perception & Psychophysics,30, 266–276.
Carpenter, G. A., &Grossberg, S. (1981). Adaptation and transmitter gating in vertebrate photoreceptors.Journal of Theoretical Neurobiology,1, 1–42.
Cogan, A. L. (1982). Monocular sensitivity during binocular viewing.Vision Research,22, 1–16.
Cogan, A. L., Silverman, G., &Sekuler, R. (1982). Binocular summation in detection of contrast flashes.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 330–338.
Cohen, M. A., &Grossberg, S. (1984). Some global properties of binocular resonances: Disparity matching, filling-in, and figure-ground synthesis. In P. Dodwell & T. Caelli (Eds.),Figural synthesis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coren, S. (1983). When “filling-in” fails.The Behavioral and Brain Sciences,6, 661–662.
Cornsweet, T. N. (1970).Visual perception. New York: Academic Press.
Curtis, D. W., &Rule, S. J. (1980). Fechner’s paradox reflects a nonmonotone relation between binocular brightness and luminance.Perception & Psychophysics,27, 263–266.
Day, R. H. (1983). Neon color spreading, partially delineated borders, and the formation of illusory contours.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 488–490.
Engel, G. R. (1969). The auto-correlation function and binocular brightness mixing.Vision Research,9, 1111–1130.
Gellatly, A. R. H. (1980). Perception of an illusory triangle with masked inducing figure.Perception,9, 599–602.
Gerrits, H. J. M., de Haan, B., &Vendrick, A. J. H. (1966). Experiments with retinal stabilized images: Relations between the observations and neural data.Vision Research,6, 427–440.
Gerrits, H. J. M. &Timmerman, J. G. M. E. N. (1969). The filling-in process in patients with retinal scotomata.Vision Research,9, 439–442.
Gerrits, H. J. M., &Vendrick, A. J. H. (1970). Simultaneous contrast, filling-in process and information processing in man’s visual system.Experimental Brain Research,11, 411–430.
Graham, N. (1981). The visual system does a crude Fourier analysis of patterns. In S. Grossberg (Ed.),Mathematical psychology and psychophysiology. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Graham, N., &Nachmias, J. (1971). Detection of grating patterns containing two spatial frequencies: A test of single-channel and multiple-channel models.Vision Research,11, 251–259.
Gregory, R. L. (1966).Eye and brain. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Grossberg, S. (1975). A neural model of attention, reinforcement, and discrimination learning.International Review of Neurobiology,18, 263–327.
Grossberg, S. (1980). How does a brain build a cognitive code? Psychological Review,87, 1–51.
Grossberg, S. (1982a).Studies of mind and brain: Neural principles of learning, perception, development, cognition, and motor control. Boston: Reidel Press.
Grossberg, S. (1982b). The processing of expected and unexpected events during conditioning and attention: A psychophysiological theory.Psychological Review,89, 529–572.
Grossberg, S. (1983a). Neural substrates of binocular form perceptiom: Filtering, matching, diffusion, and resonance. In E. Basar, H. Flohr, H. Haken, & A. J. Mandell (Eds.),Synergetics of the brain. New York: Springer.
Grossberg, S. (1983b). The quantized geometry of visual space: The coherent computation of depth, form, and lightness.Behavioral and Brain Sciences,6, 625–692.
Grossberg, S. (1984). Outline of a theory of brightness, color, and form perception. In E. Degreef & J. van Buggenhaut (Eds.).Trends in mathematical psychology. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Grossberg, S. (1985).Neural dynamics of depth, brightness, color, and form perception: A predictive synthesis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Grossberg, S., &Mingolla, E. (1985). Nonlinear competition, cooperation, and diffusion in the neural dynamics of visual perception. In B. D. Sleeman & R. J. Jarvis (Eds.),Proceedings of the Dundee conference on ordinary and partial differential equations, 1984. New York: Springer.
Grossberg, S., & Mingolla, E. (in press). Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading.Psychological Review.
Hamada, J. (1976). A mathematical model for brightness and contour perception.Hokkaido Report of Psychology, HRP-11-76-17.Hamada, J. (1978). Antagonistic and non-antagonistic processes for the lightness perception.Hokkaido Behavioral Science Report, HBSR-P-4.
Hamada, J. (1980, July 6-12). Antagonistic and non-antagonistic processes in the lightness perception.Proceedings of XXII International Congress of Psychology, Leipzig.
Heggelund, P., &Krekung, S. (1976). Edge dependent lightness distributions at different adaptation levels.Vision Research,16, 493–496.
Helmholtz, H. von (1962).Physiological optics. (J. P. C. Southall, Ed. & Trans.). New York: Dover.
Hendrickson, A. E., Hunt, S. P., &Wu, J.-Y. (1981). Immunocytochemical localization of glutamic acid decarboxylase in monkey striate cortex.Nature,292, 605–607.
Hering, E. (1964).Outlines of a theory of the light sense. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Horton, J. C., &Hubel, D. H. (1981). Regular patchy distribution of cytochrome oxidase staining in primary visual cortex of macaque monkey.Nature,292, 762–764.
Hubel, D. H., & Livingstone, M. S. (1981). Regions of poor orientation tuning coincide with patches of cytochrome oxidase staining in monkey striate cortex.Neuroscience Abstracts, 11th Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, 118. 12.
Hubel, D. H., &Wiesel, T. N. (1977). Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (B),198, 1–59.
Kanizsa, G. (1974). Contours without gradients or cognitive contours?Italian Journal of Psychology,1, 93–113.
Kaufman, L. (1974).Sight and mind: An introduction to visual perception. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kennedy, J. M. (1978). Illusory contours and the ends of lines.Perception,7, 605–607.
Kennedy, J. M. (1979). Subjective contours, contrast, and assimilation. In C. F. Nodine & D. F. Fisher (Eds.),Perception and pictorial representation. New York: Praeger Press.
Kennedy, J. M. (1981). Illusory brightness and the ends of petals: Change in brightness without aid of stratification or assimilation effects.Perception,10, 583–585.
Kulikowski, J. J. (1978). Limit of single vision in stereopsis depends on contour sharpness.Nature,275, 126–127.
Land, E. H. (1977). The retinex theory of color vision.Scientific American,237, 108–128.
Legge, G. E., &Rubin, G. S. (1981). Binocular interactions in suprathreshold contrast perception.Perception & Psychophysics,30, 49–61.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1965).On binocular rivalry. Soesterberg: Institute for Perception, RVO-TNO.
Livingstone, M. S., &Hubel, D. H. (1982). Thalamic inputs to cytochrome oxidase-rich regions in monkey visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,79, 6098–6101.
Mach, E. (1866). Über die Wirkung der räumlichen Verteilung des Lichtreizes auf die Netzhaut.Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss., Mathemnaturwiss. K1., Abt. 2,52, 303–322.
O’brien, V. (1958). Contour perception, illusion, and reality.Journal of the Optical Society of America,48, 112–119.
Parks, T. E. (1980). Subjective figures; Some unusual concomitant brightness effects.Perception,9, 239–241.
Parks, T. E., &Marks, W. (1983). Sharp-edged vs. diffuse illusory circles: The effects of varying luminance.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 172–176.
Petry, S., Harbeck, A., Conway, J., &Levey, J. (1983). Stimulus determinants of brightness and distinctions of subjective contours.Perception & Psychophysics,34, 169–174.
Pritchard, R. M. (1961). Stabilized images on the retina.Scientific American,204, 72–78.
Pritchard, R. M., Heron, W., &Hebb, D. O. (1960). Visual perception approached by the method of stabilized images.Canadian Journal of Psychology,14, 67–77.
Ratliff, F. (1965).Mach bands: Quantitative studies on neural networks in the retina. New York: Holden-Day.
Redies, C. &Spillmann, L. (1981). The neon color effect in the Ehrenstein illusion.Perception,10, 667–681.
Riggs, L. A., Ratliff, F., Cornsweet, J. C., &Cornsweet, T. N. (1953). The disappearance of steadily fixated visual test objects.Journal of the Optical Society of America,43, 495–501.
Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic information processing, I: Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review,84, 1–66.
Todorovíc, D. (1983).Brightness perception and the Craik-O-Brien-Cornsweet effect. Unpublished M.A. Thesis. Storrs: University of Connecticut.
van den Brink, G., &Keemink, C. J. (1976). Luminance gradients and edge effects.Vision Research,16, 155–159.
van Tuijl, H. F. J. M. (1975). A new visual illusion: Neonlike color spreading and complementary color induction between subjective contours.Acta Psychologica,39, 441–445.
van Tuijl, H. F. J. M., &de Weert, C. M. M. (1979). Sensory conditions for the occurrence of the neon spreading illusion.Perception,8, 211–215.
von der Heydt, R., Peterhans, E., &Baumgartner, G. (1984). Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses.Science,224, 1260–1262.
Yarbus, A. L. (1967).Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum Press.
Zeki, S. (1983a). Colour coding in the cerebral cortex: The reaction of cells in monkey visual cortex to wavelengths and colours.Neuroscience,9, 741–765.
Zeki, S. (1983b). Colour coding in the cerebral cortex: The responses of wavelength-selective and colour coded cells in monkey visual cortex to changes in wavelength composition.Neuroscience,9, 767–791.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
M. A. Cohen was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (NSF-IST-80-00257) and the Office of Naval Research (ONR-N000I4-83-K0337). S. Grossberg was supported in part by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR 82-0148) and the Office of Naval Research (ONR-N000I4-83-K0337).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cohen, M.A., Grossberg, S. Neural dynamics of brightness perception: Features, boundaries, diffusion, and resonance. Perception & Psychophysics 36, 428–456 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207497
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207497